FEATURE: The sound engineer as a team player

 Have you ever experienced the legendary feeling of love-hate relationships? There are countless band constellations, especially among musicians, where the relationship between frontman and guitarist in particular has produced both highly creative outpourings and self-destructive trench warfare. Well, apart from different ideas about personal and group dynamic processes, it is usually the more or less pronounced egos that have already destroyed or at least burdened well-known to famous bands. However, if you manage to incorporate some self-reflection into your actions at the crucial moment, it is usually possible to change your actions within the group for the common good, in line with the motto "Together we are strong".

But what happens when an outsider takes on a role that decides the fate of a band? In addition to the overused image of the greedy manager, it is above all the live situation that makes a band 100 percent dependent on a third party and sometimes condemns them to watch the fans cover their ears or leave the hall in horror. This fate is shared by all bands that have left the 2x-2-way-boxes-on-tall-stands league, be it an ambitious cover band or AC/DC stadium rock. In case of doubt, the artist is the fool, because no one in the audience will tell their buddy after the show that the FOH has overdriven the guitars at 3 kHz, but a curt "the-band-was-....." stifles any questions in the core.

Anyone who now thinks that this article is intended as a broadside against the guild of hall and monitor mixers couldn't be further from the mark. On the contrary, there are plenty of ways to generate a good cooperation in order to achieve a maximum sound experience. The guitarists in particular, along with the frontman, like to make pubescent scent marks, which makes cooperation with the technicians more difficult or even brings it to a standstill, so let's get on with it.

Let's first take a look at the two protagonists and their particular idiosyncrasies in order to better understand their very own behavior.

The hall mixer, better known as the front-of-house (FOH):

Even if many musicians keep forgetting it, most FOHs are (have been) musicians themselves and also know the other side of the coin. So, if they want to, they are also able to understand the guitarist's fears and concerns, but they don't always want to, or they prefer their own personal ideas. Depending on the instrument played personally, the live sound is usually also created, i.e. a trained drummer will always focus on kick and snare, which are then usually far ahead in terms of sound and quality at the show.

However, this also has the disadvantage that this instrument is under particular scrutiny and may clash with the musician's personal vision. I've heard FOHs and musicians arguing for 30 minutes about the tuning of the snare, only to have the result drown in an infernal volume later on. That was just ego-wanking, nothing more! This kind of behavior is stupid in many respects, costs time and achieves nothing, but fortunately it is usually the exception.

Applied to guitarists, this would be a discussion about the level of distortion, the stage volume, the amp used, the speaker, the microphone, the sweet spot of the speaker, etc. All of these points can be discussed in advance, but not during the sound check, but more on that later. In general, you should keep in mind that the FOH also has the goal of generating a sound that the audience perceives as clear, good, pleasant, powerful, fat, or whatever, but unfortunately there are sometimes situations that massively prevent this. More on this later.

The monitor mixer:

Let's make this short, if you feel a strong tendency towards masochism and are a regular at the local dominatrix studio, you couldn't ask for a better job. The monitor man is ALWAYS a very poor sod! Why? Well, if he does his job perfectly, nobody notices and everyone assumes that this is the standard. But if even one ping or pong is too loud, quiet, sharp, muffled or whatever, the monitor man gets the whole broadside, often enough without even knowing what for. Matching the personal monitor sound taste of the respective artist is a pure game of chance, so as a monitor man/woman you can only lose. Speaking of women, if you have the chance to get a woman as a monitor mixer, by all means take it. The raving artist is much less likely to shout at a woman than a male colleague.

The guitarist:

Next to the singer, the most annoying element in a band's sound cosmos (I can say that ;-) Logically, he is the one who gets to play a solo in almost every song. Well, in his opinion, the singer has a solo throughout the entire song and in the solo he also distracts from the solo with his grimaces, but in contrast to the poor bass figure, for example, you still look very good. OK, sometimes there's the "rhythm guitarist" who's actually just on stage because he does the booking or has the naming rights to the band, but as soon as the "lead guitarist" starts practicing regularly, it's over. Now it is important to present the laboriously developed passages to the audience in the correct acoustic lighting, i.e. AT LEAST at the volume that the singer would otherwise use for the rest of the song.

Oh yes, it should be clear that all guitarists would prefer to make instrumental music, but unfortunately even fewer visitors would come to the shows if you don't have the status of Jeff Beck or Steve Vai. So you inevitably take the “attention absorption element” on board, or you try to take on this position straight away, which I can only advise against. Note, Ritchie Kotzen is the only guitarist who both plays guitar excellently and sings equally well.

So, now that we've given each of the protagonists a lot of fun, let's focus on squaring the circle, i.e. how do we bring these people together so that not only a good sound is generated, but above all, they're fun thing is not neglected?

1.) Understand each other's situation

Anyone who has ever noticed how much stress a FOH can face, especially in a festival situation, will know the sonic result of the P.A. evaluate it completely differently. Incorrect signal transmission, crashing digital consoles or the classic, incorrectly inserted microphones give the FOH no chance to create a sound, it's a pure fight for survival. If the talkback to the stage fails, nothing works anymore. Here it is absolutely counterproductive to generate additional stress through wild gestures or verbal attacks, especially since the FOH's brain is first busy solving the problem.

The same applies to a monitor man. Even though incompetence ("he wasn't good enough for FOH") can almost bring the show to a standstill, wild screaming or raging won't change the situation other than making the result worse. On the other hand, you have to keep in mind that if the sound is missing or too loud, no musician will be able to perform. Just worrying about sound causes 99 percent of all guitarists to become so tense that their personal performance plummets. The more confidence a technician exudes, the more he ensures relaxation.

2.) Talk to each other in advance

If you don't communicate with each other, you can't know what the other person wants. I know FOHs who used to work with the Bundesliga der Künstler and complement their basic latent arrogance with complete resistance to advice. Here you should briefly remind yourself who the employer and who the employee is, if you continue the ego trip, separate yourself from the same. But I also know FOHs who sit with you before the show and work out as many parallels as possible in terms of sound and listen to the band's special features.

Only if you exchange ideas in advance can you minimize misunderstandings. It helps enormously if you have a basic knowledge of sound engineering Latin and, as a guitarist, you don't just express yourself in emotional helplessness jargon in the style of "must press". Of course, it is not the guitarist's job to tell the FOH the quality value of the fully parametric mid-range filter, but it helps a lot if you are familiar with frequencies so that you can tell the technician your preferred peaks. Exchange creates trust on both sides and helps the subsequent show immensely.


3.) Volume

The most important point of all! AT ALL!!! Ma can't mention it often enough, but guitarists in particular have an unrivaled hearing threshold that is almost implanted in the brain with the instrument. “Our amps shoot sharply and forward.” Loud, louder, loudest and then with the wrong speaker setup. Well, now everyone has calmed down again and we're getting to the bottom of the problem, both for the men and women on the 6-8 strings, as well as for the men at the mixer. Yes, they also often have a tough time when it comes to volume.

First of all, nothing, really nothing, can be compared to the adrenaline rush when you stand in front of a torn full stack in heavy crunch mode and emit AC/DC-like riff material in a state of potency. A fantastic experience, which was a necessary evil from the Sixties up to the late seventies. Due to the lack of powerful P.A. systems, a lot of sound had to be provided from the stage, with the result that you had a great guitar sound on stage and were deaf after 10 years at the latest. But it wasn't so bad, because very few rock stars at that time didn't even live to see their 50th birthday, so at least they had a great sound up to that point.

Nobody, not even the writer of these lines, can claim freedom from this body feeling, although nowadays nobody is willing to accept the inevitable loss of hearing. In addition, in times of in-ear systems, stage volumes beyond the “I can still create feedback with this” threshold have become obsolete. If you now place the cabinets straight forward, the backline will already generate so much sound pressure from the stage that the FOH can overpower the P.A. has to tear up too much to get over it. He has to do this in order to be able to level the instruments independently, or he leaves the sound on one side of the hall to the backline and just turns the guitar a little towards the other side, which always leads to an unbalanced sound.

The solution lies in the stage construction. If you need a minimum volume for your sound that, according to FOH, is above the acceptable limit and have reliable musicians, you should set up your backline at a 90 degree angle to the front of the stage. This has the advantage that all the energy radiates onto the stage and you hardly need the guitar in the monitor anymore. The disadvantage is that you now have to adjust your volume to the wishes of your colleagues. If you can't find a suitable solution here, you resort to the most unusual solution: you use your cabinets as wedges. With a 412 you need a photo pit plus a flight case, but with a 212 you can also achieve good things on a normal stage.

And now to the FOH in terms of volume! In short, these guys aren't any better than guitarists. Here too, most sound drivers define themselves by an extremely pressing kick and a banging snare, which means that the final volume in the hall is too high in 90% of all cases.

Thanks to Class D technology, countless kilowatts are available today, which requires almost all concertgoers to come to the concert with hearing protection. Conclusion: some FOHs also mix for hearing protection, which means an additional increase in volume. The result is unbearable. Any subtleties in guitar playing, nothing remains of sound aspects such as pickups or amplifiers, you can be grateful if you can even hear what the musicians are playing. When was the last time you heard what the bassist was playing in a band context at a rock/metal concert?

The solution is so incredibly simple that you can barely say it, just turn it down. Even at a rock concert, even at a metal concert. Just because one drunk fan shouts for more noise and the one drunk writer during the concert later writes in the review that the volume was too low, it is not the job of the hall mixer to throw the remaining music fans their expensively purchased audiofil card into the trash can.

4.) Sound Live / Rehearsal Room / Studio

As a guitarist, you go through a development process regarding your sound that lasts your entire life. First of all, it takes years to find your sound and match it with your technical skills. From this point on, the rehearsal room sound is the measure of all things, not to be surpassed in terms of naturalness (unless you are already contaminated with Kemper). Then comes the first shock during demo recordings, where you realize that the guitar sounds completely different on studio monitors in the control room than in the rehearsal room. There is a lack of pressure, interaction with the loudspeaker and everything seems much less pressured. Only through a lot of persuasion does the sound engineer finally manage to get the guitarist to realize that a microphone that is stuck to the speaker works differently than the ear, etc.

The second shock hits the musician on stage when he hears his sound through a monitor box. Sharp, pointed (if only you could disconnect the tweeter...) and then the FOH tells you that the guitar sound isn't good. The FOH can influence some frequencies through microphone selection and positioning, but what it cannot change is the level of distortion. Remember, the less gain, the better your sound can be mixed in the end. Your playing becomes more dynamic, clearer, more direct, more transparent, even seemingly louder. For the solo sound you can add another channel or the ominous overdrive, but for the rhythm sound you should only use the level of distortion that you absolutely have to have, no more. Less feedback and a “widened sound” will thank you.

Conclusion

Communication, volume, relaxation, fun! Off and done!

FEATURE: Does it still needs record labels these days?

 Do we still need labels these days, especially in the guitar music sector? Even if you have a subjective personal answer immediately to hand, at second glance it is a question that is not quite so easy to answer. You can find out why in this feature.

History lesson

Just a quick history lesson, why do we talk about a label at all? Well, the major collecting societies, i.e. record companies, signed several artists of different styles and orientations at the time. In order to be able to catalog them better as well as manage them better economically, a record company was divided into several labels, which was then reflected in the different imprints on the vinyl records. Over the decades, the introduction of indie record companies, most of which specialized in just one genre of music, blurred the different terms, so that today the term label is more or less synonymous with the term record company.

What is the job of a label?

In principle, the record company does the work that the artist did not want to do or was unable to do due to a lack of training. At the beginning of the exploitation of music up until the early 1980s, the artist was given an artist contract, which guaranteed him a share of sales of up to approx. 10% of the HAP (retail price) of every sound carrier sold. All costs incurred, such as recording studio rental, pressing of the recordings, studio musicians, meals and accommodation for the musicians during the recording sessions, promotion, marketing etc. were covered by the record company, which in return secured at least 90% of the revenue. The major record companies usually had their own recording studios, which were in constant use for the artists' recordings with permanently employed technicians.

This all changed with the introduction of the recording contract. For the first time, the artist, or rather the management, was involved in the administration, as there was a fixed advance payment from the record company for which the artist had to deliver one or more albums. You were free to choose the studio and, depending on the rate you negotiated with the studio owner, you could use part of the advance for private purposes as long as the end result was to the liking of the record company executives. The advance can be offset, i.e. you do not receive any royalties until the advance has been recouped through sales. As this is at the artist's expense, the artist receives a higher share of the profits AFTER the advance has been repaid, on average up to approx. 20% of the HAP.

However, the two business models mentioned above have now largely become obsolete with the introduction of home recording and streaming services. Although streaming services are known to pay out pitifully low margins to labels, almost 50% of sales are still generated by streaming services, which suggests that well over 90% of the world's population consumes music almost exclusively via streaming services. Only a few vinyl and CD lovers are keeping up with their purchases, which has meant that only international superstars can generate correspondingly large revenues. The situation is comparable to the price of concert tickets. If Metallica ask €200 for a ticket, the stadium is sold out after a few hours, if the local hero band wants €20, everyone complains about the high ticket prices.

The logistical effects of the technical revolution

Of course, the technical possibilities that a DAW has offered for years are simply fantastic and enable recordings to be made that produce good results for very little money. I don't want to open the barrel of sound quality analog vs. digital, original vs. simulation, because one thing you should always keep in mind is that the economic results don't give a damn how a sound was produced. In contrast to the past, high-end productions today no longer ensure any economic advantages, as the mastering process, at the latest, means that even the most technical garbage pulled down to 0 dB only reveals to real experts whether, for example, a Chris Lord Alge sat at the controls or whether Greti and Kleti switched plug-in presets on and off.

Which puts us in the middle of the label discussion, because today a label only has 3 functions: to provide a secure distribution, to offer a professional marketing department and to guarantee a reputation to the outside world. Even if the major companies still achieve gigantic sales with their back catalog alone, most labels only pay a small advance, and in the majority of cases no advance at all, especially for newcomers.

Conversely, this means that the artist either sticks everything together himself in his home studio, or he takes money in his hand and pays a rental studio to record his music. Either way, the artist must first make a financial advance payment before he can get one or more songs out to the public. At this point at the latest, the first readers will ask themselves why a label is needed at all, which incidentally would also like to have a percentage of the live fees in the so-called 360 degree deals. What does the label get in return?

The services of a label

To put it in a nutshell, if you want to pursue your music as a hobby, have a good time and make your music available to your friends, family and a manageable number of fans, you definitely don't need a label. Many service providers offer the listing of personal recordings in all major streaming services worldwide for a monthly/annual or sometimes one-off fee. A certain level of quality must be maintained, but anyone who fails here should consider whether their music is really worth publishing. Otherwise, CDs and vinyl can be produced in very small quantities and then sold via your personal online store or marketplace, etc., and that's it. Income 100% minus the commissions of the respective intermediaries. Everything, really everything, that is needed to promote your personal output is up to you, which usually means that the radius of your personal brand awareness does not expand.

This is where an established label can really score points, provided it is really interested in you and your achievements. An established label usually has an established marketing structure consisting of permanent employees and freelancers, who in turn maintain contact with the trade press, etc. Once in the label's roster, you have access to a well-stocked database with the relevant contacts, so that your personal work at least gets to more or less interested writers, sometimes even journalists.

However, this does not mean that corresponding articles or interviews will be printed with you, as this largely depends on the placement of corresponding advertisements. All magazines always emphasize that they are not for sale, but every expert knows that the pure sale of magazines only covers a negligible part of the production and personnel costs, so that advertising is the decisive point in product planning. Only Tesla can afford not to advertise its products.

As a result, we have reached a point of complete perversion in the exploitation of music. I know some artists who not only pay for the entire production of their album themselves, do not receive any advance payment from the label and also pay for the entire marketing such as advertising etc. themselves, they also pay the label for the use of their infrastructure. In "normal" life, all musicians have a regular job with which they earn enough money to be able to afford to "play rock star" as a hobby. Imagine this situation in a normal trade, a bricklayer who buys all the tools himself and pays the builder to build a wall for him for free. I would be very curious to see the reaction of the trade unions and other bricklayers.

How should the artist behave?

As I said, it is not easy to give final guidance. Personally, I would simply make a calculation. Working without a label or setting up your own label means total artistic freedom, but it also means taking on all the financial costs and a lot of cold calling, which sometimes pushes you to your human limits. Because you should always be aware of one thing: nobody, absolutely NOBODY has been waiting for you and your music, no matter how good, unusual and entertaining you are.

However, if you are convinced of the quality of your music and are able and willing to provide a mid five-figure sum per planned album for record production, GEMA, marketing, promotion, tour support, recording studio rental, travel expenses, photographer, video artist, social media manager and much more, you can also work without a label. What's more, you can't do this work in the evening after a regular 9 to 5 job on the side. Ultimately, this can only be guaranteed if you are either a private individual or have financial leeway over a longer period of time thanks to an inheritance that keeps your back free.

The nice thing is, however, that if you have held out for several years and have been able to establish your music to such an extent that you have been noticed by the respective scene, the labels will approach you all by themselves and offer their support, usually at much better conditions than was the case at the beginning of your career. Again, always remember that this behavior is completely normal and legitimate, record companies are commercial enterprises, not cultural promotion programs! It's like any other job, it's nothing personal, it's just about money. If you always keep this wisdom in mind, everything doesn't hurt so much.

———————-

The Evolution of Record Labels: A Comprehensive Journey through their Origin and Development

Introduction:

The music industry has undergone a remarkable transformation over the years, with record labels playing a pivotal role in shaping the landscape. The evolution of record labels can be traced back to the late 19th century, and their journey has been marked by technological advancements, cultural shifts, and business innovations. In this article, we will explore the rich history of record labels, from their humble beginnings to their current status as key players in the global music ecosystem.

The Birth of the Phonograph and the Emergence of Record Labels:

The story begins in the late 19th century when Thomas Edison invented the phonograph in 1877. This groundbreaking invention allowed for the mechanical reproduction of sound, paving the way for the mass production and distribution of music. However, it wasn't until the early 20th century that record labels, as we know them today, started to take shape.

In the early 1900s, independent entrepreneurs recognized the commercial potential of recorded music and began to establish small companies to manufacture and distribute records. These early record labels were often localized and focused on specific genres or regional artists. They played a crucial role in popularizing the concept of recorded music, as they produced and distributed
physical records made of shellac.

The Jazz Age and the Rise of Major Labels:

The 1920s witnessed the Jazz Age, a period that saw the rapid growth of the music industry and the establishment of major record labels. Companies like RCA Victor, Columbia Records, and Decca Records emerged as dominant players, creating a framework for the modern record label. These major labels exerted significant control over recording, manufacturing, and distribution processes, allowing them to shape the musical landscape by promoting certain genres and artists.

The Golden Era of Vinyl and the Influence of Technology:

The mid-20th century marked the golden era of vinyl records, with 33⅓ RPM LPs and 45 RPM singles becoming the standard formats. This period saw the consolidation of major labels' power and the emergence of iconic figures like Berry Gordy Jr., who founded Motown Records in 1959. Technological advancements, such as stereo recording and the advent of magnetic tape, further transformed the recording process, enhancing the quality of music production.

The Counterculture Movement and Independent Labels:

The 1960s and 1970s witnessed a cultural revolution, with the counterculture movement challenging the mainstream. Independent labels gained prominence during this period as they provided a platform for alternative and experimental music. Labels like Stax Records and Sun Records played crucial roles in promoting genres like soul and rock 'n' roll, while also fostering the careers of legendary artists like Elvis Presley and Otis Redding.

The Digital Revolution and the Challenges for Record Labels:

The late 20th century brought about the digital revolution, profoundly impacting the music industry. The introduction of CDs in the 1980s and digital formats in the 1990s transformed how music was consumed. This shift posed challenges for traditional record labels as online piracy and file-sharing became prevalent. To adapt, labels had to explore new business models and embrace digital distribution platforms.

The 21st Century: Streaming Dominance and Label Diversification:

The 21st century has been marked by the dominance of streaming services. Companies like Spotify, Apple Music, and Deezer have revolutionized how people access and consume music. Record labels have had to adapt once again, negotiating complex licensing agreements with streaming platforms to ensure fair compensation for artists. Moreover, some artists have chosen to bypass traditional labels, utilizing independent distribution channels made possible by the internet.

Conclusion:

The evolution of record labels is a fascinating journey that mirrors the dynamic changes in technology, culture, and business practices. From the early days of shellac records to the streaming-dominated landscape of today, record labels have navigated through various challenges and transformations. Despite the shifting landscape, these entities continue to play a vital role in shaping the music industry, discovering talent, and bringing music to audiences worldwide. As we move forward, the role of record labels will undoubtedly continue to evolve, adapting to new technologies and cultural shifts while remaining at the forefront of the ever-changing music ecosystem.

Feature: The Future Of The Album Format

 Does the album format really still make sense today? In order to really answer this question, as is almost always the case, we have to dig a little deeper, especially when it comes to the historical context. Now then, why "long-playing records" at all and what is the meaning behind them?

As always, when it comes to the dissemination of music, the commercial aspect is at the forefront. Very few artists like to hear this statement, but it is and remains a fact. By the way, no one is surprised that a craftsman primarily pays attention to his hourly wage, but as soon as a musical "craftsman" takes the same approach, he can expect an official shitstorm in the style of "art instead of commerce" and "filthy lucre".

If we turn the clock back about 80 years, we end up in the area where the commercial use of the sound carrier took off. Up to that point, there were simply only live concerts if you wanted to listen to music outside of your personal home. Although this was socially beneficial, it was associated with corresponding travel expenses and time dependency. How nice it would be if you could enjoy the music of your favorite artist at home, regardless of the imposed concert schedule. The record was born. First as a single, then later in the coveted LP version, on which there was room for several tracks at once and you didn't have to get up after every song to change the record. The absolute mood killer, especially in the area of cuddly music.

The format, born out of the desire for more sales, developed magnificently and not only enabled the artists to achieve gigantic sales in some cases, but the large cover surface also offered the artist the opportunity, both visually and in terms of a concept album, to coordinate the order of the tracks in relation to the narrative thread and to take the listener on a journey into creativity for a maximum of 45 - 50 minutes. People would meet up to listen to music together, the album would of course be listened to at least once in one go and then they would spend hours discussing what the artist wanted to say with their output. There were no research methods a la the Internet, so there were no limits to personal interpretation.

The possibilities of recording an album professionally were very limited. It required acoustically perfected premises in the real estate sector, a gigantic investment in professional equipment such as microphones, outgear, consoles and, above all, technical and artistic staff who could both operate and maintain the huge fleet of vehicles. Depending on the artist, the release of a new album was an event of the highest category and sometimes caused long queues in front of the record stores on the release day, which you had laboriously found out through friends or the trade press. You had artists who were superstars, record companies who were bathing in money and fans who were happy to be part of the big machine and were over the moon about every special edition of a record.

And now let's take a quick shake, open our eyes and come back to the present, where artistic hell awaits us!

The present

To start with, I'm by no means one of those guys who carries the credo "everything used to be better" on a coat of arms. On the contrary, some of my artistic and commercial successes would not have been possible without the current exploitation structures, so I am very ambivalent about today's opportunities.

But the current situation looks much more like this. Modern DAW's have not opened up the possibility for the artist to do most of the audio work themselves, they have introduced the OBLIGATION to do so! Where record companies used to have budgets that allowed professional sound engineers, producers, songwriters, lyricists and arrangers to be hired and paid on the basis of the high income from record sales, today's Advance model is limited to "zero advance" for newcomers or "20% of what was paid 20 years ago" for established artists.

The development runs according to the guidelines. There isn't a musician today who doesn't have a "home studio" in some room of his apartment and tries to get close to his desired sound with Kemper and Superior Drummer. Well done to anyone who makes electronic music and has probably never had to think about the complex social structures of a band. The result for the "band musician" is inevitably almost always the same. Happy to have put enough hours into practicing his personal instrument, he is now also expected to be a songwriter, lyricist, sound engineer, arranger, producer and, of course, to be able to mix and master the product perfectly without ever having undergone any further training. The sonic results in the form of pumping compressors, EQ lines without sense and reason and channel strips stuffed with plugins can be heard millions of times on YouTube and the corresponding streaming services.

Now let's get back to the actual question: is it still worth recording an album these days? The answer: No! "But all bands still do it". Exactly, but it doesn't change the fact that it has become pointless. Let's take a look at the individual arguments:

1) Concept album with corresponding sequence of tracks

With "Violence", superstar Adele recently pushed through Spotify that the random play button on an album can only be activated with special settings. This action is intended to save the artist's dramatic intention in the order of the tracks. Why is such an action important? Because the vast majority of music listeners don't care what is played in which order! To avoid misunderstandings, yes, there are still music listeners who are interested in an album and an artist, but the number of these music lovers is probably in the per mille range.


2) The value of an album

Cubase and Logic have opened Pandora's box. On the one hand, undreamt-of possibilities of perfection and self-sufficiency for the professional artist, on the other hand, an unprecedented flooding of the market with all possible and impossible outputs. The result is the same as on the financial market, what is available in abundance no longer has any value. Anyone who has ever tried to make an impression at a party by saying "my new album will be released next week" knows what I'm talking about. You can only impress people by saying "I'm playing at a sold-out Wacken Open Air in front of 80,000 people next week", but you won't get anyone behind the stove with a "sound carrier" these days.


3) The regular "Let yourself be heard"

The attention span of a younger music listener who grows up with formats such as TikTok is around 60 - 90 seconds, after which almost everything and everyone becomes "boring". It's best to regularly point out your personal output at short intervals and that's that. An album with approx. 10 - 12 tracks will get all the tracks out at once and will hold your attention for maybe a week at most, after which most fans will want new content. I have fans in Brazil who ask me 4 weeks after the release of an album when the next album is coming. So why not release a single track every week or every month? This procedure keeps your back free for 3 months or a whole year and the fan gets new content at regular intervals.


4) The physical sound carrier

As already mentioned several times, the CD format is dying and is only quietly rattling along. Attempts are made to keep collectors interested with elaborate special editions, which succeed up to a certain point, but do not really make economic sense due to the high production costs. Even the constantly praised vinyl department, which has established itself with a market share of just under 7%, can hardly be satisfied with a "normal" black LP. It has to be at least 4 different colors, preferably even more with corresponding production costs. Is that why fans buy the same album several times in different colors? Hardly ...

And now? what to do?

Ultimately, of course, every artist has to decide for themselves whether they want to go down the traditional route of marketing or whether they want to explore new avenues. Of course, it is easier for the music magazine trade press to interview the artist about a new album than about a single new song. However, the extent to which this traditional form of music magazine will survive in the next few years is another matter entirely.

Far be it from me to denigrate an artist's output in the form of an album. I remember only too well how proud I was to hold my first album in my hands, on which I could be heard and on whose cover I was depicted. Apart from the fact that the album sounded really shitty and by today's standards I can only beat my hands over my head, this action was almost 4 decades ago and a lot has changed in this respect in recent times.

So don't hang your head, but maybe think about a few format alternatives, it could be worth it ...

————

The Comprehensive History of Vinyl Records

Introduction

Vinyl records have a rich history that spans over a century1. They’ve been around for over a century now, and their roots trace back to American inventors like Thomas Edison and others from around the world1. Since the days of the phonograph and gramophone, advancements in audio technology have made vinyl one of the most compelling and immersive ways to listen to music1.

The Beginning: The Phonograph

The grandfather of the modern turntable was the phonograph, an invention created by Thomas Edison way back in 18771. This device was a far cry from the record players of today, but the ingenious technology at its core was remarkably similar1. Phonographs served two purposes – recording sound and playing it back1. The devices were equipped with foil-coated cylinders, which could have grooves etched in them by one of their two needles1. The recording needle would write recorded sound into the cylinder, which could then be played back by running a second needle through the grooves1. The phonograph was powered by a crank mechanism, which the user had to turn manually throughout the recording and playback process1. While that might sound like a hassle, the technology was completely revolutionary for its time, and it laid the groundwork for the turntable that came after it.

The Phonograph Evolves Into the Gramophone

After Edison’s phonograph changed the world, the next innovation in audio technology came from a German immigrant named Emile Berliner1. Berliner’s gramophone, the father of the modern record player, was invented ten years after the phonograph, and it bears much more resemblance to the turntables you’re familiar with1. The gramophone made several major departures from the design and function of the phonograph that came before it1. For one, the gramophone used flat discs instead of cylinders to play back recorded audio, and these discs were created without the use of the gramophone itself1. The use of a device strictly to play back recorded music instead of recording the music itself made the gramophone much more consumer-friendly than its predecessor

Early Vinyl Records

After the gramophone grew in popularity, new versions were created that made the technology more accessible, affordable, and suitable for the early 20th-century consumer1. The discs used on the earliest record players were made from shellac, not vinyl, and they could only be played at 78 revolutions per minute (RPM)1. We now know that records with higher RPM have the potential for better sound quality, but at the time, the speed at which these shellac discs spun was based on necessity. The 78s, as they became known, could only hold a few minutes of recorded music on each side

Shellac vs Vinyl Records

Vinyl records are called “vinyl” records because of their material composition2. Records today are made from polyvinyl chloride (PVC), hence the nickname vinyl2. Polyvinyl chloride can be many different colors, which is why you might see some colored vinyl in your record collecting adventures2! The earliest records invented were made from shellac2, so these would technically just be records, and not vinyl records2. However, those shellac records are not made anymore2. Records started being pressed more frequently on vinyl partly due to less available shellac for record production during World War II2. Shellac records eventually stopped being made around 19602. The older shellac records (also called 78s) were much more brittle and heavier than the newer vinyl records2. Vinyl records are more prone to warping and scratches than shellac records (because they’re more lightweight), but are still thought of as a better record material because they have less audio feedback.

Different Types of Records

Records come in various sizes. The most common sizes of records are 12″, 10″ and 7″ records2. Most albums are recorded on 12 inch records, and most singles are recorded on 7 inch records2. Records are also made with different rpms or revolutions per minute2. The rpm is the speed at which a vinyl spins.

The Rise of Vinyl Records

The vinyl record took off during the 1940s and 1950s, particularly after World War II. With the rise of the music industry, the demand for recorded music grew, and vinyl records became the primary medium for recorded music.

Conclusion

The significant period for vinyl records was from the inception of the vinyl LP in 1948, to 1988, when CDs outsold records for the first time1. However, the format definitely isn’t going anywhere anytime soon1. Today, vinyl records are still a vital part of music history2 and continue to be a popular medium for music enthusiasts around the world.

TEST: Radial Engineering DI Boxen

 What does the common sound engineer / producer / sound engineer do when he wants to impress his colleagues or customers? He shows his expansive consoles, his high-performance DAWs or his elaborate monitors, or P.A. components. What he is guaranteed not to show are the small, inconspicuous little helpers, mostly the size of a cigarette pack, without which a proper signal flow would not be possible either in the studio or on stage.

The diverse manifestations of the D.I. Box, the device that converts, sums or simply adjusts high-impedance and low-impedance, or symmetrical and asymmetrical signals along with all their connector variants, so that they can be further processed in the best quality by the targeted signal manager. Doesn't sound really exciting, but it's one of those areas where small mistakes cause big problems that can't be repaired later in the signal flow.

Aware of this, there is a whole smorgasbord of D.I. Boxes that give the different signals the necessary processing options. It's hard to believe what kind of constellations you can deal with these days.

construction

What all Radial Engineering products have in common is their high-quality mechanical design. The housings, made in Canada, are made of solid sheet metal and should easily withstand tough everyday road use. On the underside of the case, a glued-on, continuous foam rubber plate offers a good grip even on smooth surfaces.

The product range in detail:

Radial Engineering SB-1

The little one from the StageBug series, which comes in a blue case, is also listed as the SB-1 Acoustic, since its primary area of application is feeding an acoustic guitar into a P.A. is. However, since the product can also process an e-bass or line signals, such as those coming from moderate keyboards, the decision was made to change the name. As an active DI box, the product can run with 48V phantom power, which almost every mixer offers.

The product provides an unbalanced jack input along with a tuner output, which can also be used to feed an acoustic guitar amp. The two holes are right next to each other and just about allow for two massive Neutrik plugs in terms of distance. Milled clean! For signals with high output power, a PAD switch can be activated with -10 dB. For any feedback that may occur, the phase can be changed using another switch, a ground lift attached to the side of the housing, which can only be activated/deactivated with a pointed object, suppresses any mains hum that may occur. The output is via a standard XLR cable.

Radial Engineering SB-2

The Nato green version of the StageBug series is largely identical to the SB-1, although it is a passive version and is primarily dedicated to very powerful signals such as active basses or keyboards. Dj equipment also finds an optimal converter from asymmetrical to symmetrical here.

A special feature is the auto merge function, which routes a stereo keyboard from the input and the thru input to a mono channel when both inputs are used. In this way, channels can be saved if necessary. The phase switch has been omitted, all other functions are the same as the SB-1.

The result is an extremely high-impedance signal and a preamp that's ripped up to the hilt, but mostly doesn't manage to eliminate the harsh basic sound. This is where the Radial Engineering SB-4 can work wonders with its unusual 5 megaohm input. In addition to a phase switch and a ground lift, the product also has a high-pass filter that starts at 150 Hz with 6 dB / octave. The practical knowledge of the Radial crew is also evident here. A standard low-cut filter that cuts in at 80 Hz would cut low on an acoustic stringed instrument, while the rumble section at 150 Hz is a much better choice, especially in live situations.

Radial Engineering SB-5

Another specialist enters the stage with the SB-5. The mini-jack stereo cable fixed to the side quickly reveals its area of application. We're talking about iPads, iPhones and notebooks, whose internally built-in audio outputs cannot be beaten in terms of sensitivity and operational reliability, but sometimes have to be managed.

The Radial Engineering SB-5 is therefore designed somewhat differently than its colleagues, despite the same dimensions. It also has PAD and ground lift switches, but the signal, which is mostly in stereo, can be output via two symmetrical TRS jacks on the right / left or via an XLR jack in summed mono. Optionally, you can also purchase an L-bracket for this product, with which you can attach the Radial Engineering SB-5 to a rack or desk.

Radial Engineering SB-6

The Radial Engineering SB-6 takes the flexibility of a DI box to the next level. The product, which is consistently based on stereo, takes on several functions that can cause problems in the studio and on stage. On the one hand, it takes over the classic function of a stereo DI box, i.e. with the shortest possible unbalanced cables in the box and with symmetric cables of any length out of the box.

The next function, eliminating a power loop between two balanced audio devices, but powered by different circuits. Here a so-called potential difference can cause strong mains hum. The same applies to guitarists who want to play through 2 different amplifiers at the same time. In order to avoid the life-threatening masking of the protective conductor on one of the amplifiers, you can, for example, go from the guitar into a stereo effects device, isolate the two outputs via the Radial Engineering SB-6 and then feed them into the amplifier. In addition to the separate ground lifts, this is also achieved by changing the polarity of the left channel in order to avoid phase cancellations.

Radial Engineering SB-48UB

The Radial Engineering SB-48UB shows its qualities the moment you want to send a condenser microphone through a stage amplifier or an effects pedal. Most products of this type only have unbalanced inputs, so the incoming signal must be converted beforehand.

The DI Box comes with its own power supply and supplies either 12 or 48V phantom power. A standard XLR socket is used as input, the balanced and unbalanced output can be used simultaneously.

Radial Engineering SB-48 power bar

The Radial Engineering SB-48 Powerbar is a pantomime generator, which also comes with its own power supply (15 V - 400 mA). The product supplies two microphones or similar with either 12 or 48V phantom power if the connected mixer cannot supply the same.

Radial Engineering BT Pro Bluetooth

The highlight at the end of the list. According to modern sound technology, an ambitious technician should nowadays have a Bluetooth D.I. have a box at the start. The BT-Pro comes with the same Built-As-A-Rock feel, which suggests a long service life, especially since the pulled-over housing tabs additionally protect the ground lift switch, the mono summing switch and the headphone volume control. Unfortunately, the headphone jack is only a mini jack. Both signals can also be isolated to eliminate ground loops.

Conclusion

All Radial Engineering DI boxes shine with a very good sound, excellent workmanship, small dimensions and very good practicality. Whenever a signal needs to be converted symmetrically, Radial Engineering offers the right little box, it's just a matter of finding the perfect area of application.


Additional Informations:

Radial Engineering: A Leading Force in Professional Audio Solutions
Introduction:
Radial Engineering Ltd., founded in 1991 in Vancouver, Canada, is a renowned name in the professional audio industry. As a manufacturer of high-quality audio equipment, Radial Engineering has built a solid reputation for innovative designs, reliability, and superior sound performance. With a diverse product portfolio catering to recording studios, live sound, broadcast, and touring applications, Radial Engineering has become a trusted choice for audio professionals worldwide.
Founding and Early Years:
Radial Engineering was established by Peter Janis, a seasoned entrepreneur with a passion for audio technology. The company's initial focus was on designing and manufacturing custom audio solutions for the music and broadcast industries. This personalized approach quickly gained popularity, leading Radial Engineering to expand its product range and become a recognized player in the professional audio market.
Commitment to Innovation:

At the heart of Radial Engineering's success lies its commitment to innovation and ingenuity. The company's engineers and product designers are driven by the desire to address real-world audio challenges and offer practical, effective solutions. This ethos has resulted in numerous industry-first innovations and patents that have set new benchmarks for audio performance and functionality.
Product Portfolio:

Radial Engineering boasts an extensive and diverse product portfolio, encompassing a wide range of audio solutions designed to meet the needs of various audio professionals. Key product categories include:

a. Direct Boxes (DI Boxes): Radial Engineering's DI boxes are highly regarded for their transparent sound, signal isolation, and durability. The JDI, J48, and ProD2 are among the popular DI models used by musicians, live sound engineers, and recording studios.

b. Reamp Devices: Radial Engineering's Reamp boxes enable reamping, a process where recorded dry signals are sent back to amplifiers for additional processing and tonal shaping. The Radial Reamp JCR and X-Amp have become industry standards for this application.

c. Signal Processors: Radial Engineering offers a range of signal processors, including preamps, compressors, and channel strips, which are prized for their sonic integrity and versatility.

d. Switching and Routing: Radial Engineering's switching and routing solutions, such as the SW8 and JX44 V2, provide efficient and seamless control over audio signals in live and studio environments.

e. Direct-Drive: The Radial Direct-Drive is a unique preamp and distortion pedal that combines the functions of a DI box and a distortion pedal, catering to the needs of professional musicians and recording artists.

High-Profile Users and Endorsements:
Radial Engineering's commitment to excellence and innovative design has attracted an impressive list of high-profile users and endorsements. Renowned musicians, engineers, and producers rely on Radial Engineering's products in their live performances, studio recordings, and touring setups. This widespread adoption by industry professionals further cements Radial Engineering's status as a trusted brand in the audio community.

Global Reach and Manufacturing:
While headquartered in Vancouver, Canada, Radial Engineering's products are distributed and used globally. The company's commitment to quality extends to its manufacturing process, with products being assembled in-house to ensure consistent performance and reliability.

Conclusion:
Radial Engineering's journey from a small custom audio solutions provider to a global force in the professional audio industry is a testament to its commitment to innovation, quality, and customer satisfaction. With an impressive product portfolio, endorsements from industry professionals, and a reputation for exceptional audio performance, Radial Engineering continues to be at the forefront of audio technology. As the industry evolves, Radial Engineering's dedication to innovation and delivering practical, reliable solutions ensures that it remains a trusted partner for audio professionals worldwide.

- DI Boxes: The Essential Link for Seamless Audio Integration

Introduction:
Direct Injection (DI) boxes, also known as direct boxes or DI units, play a crucial role in professional audio applications, bridging the gap between different audio systems and ensuring a seamless and reliable audio integration process. Designed to convert unbalanced, high-impedance signals into balanced, low-impedance signals, DI boxes are indispensable tools for musicians, audio engineers, and recording studios. This comprehensive report explores the principles, applications, types, and advantages of DI boxes in the world of professional audio.
Principles of Operation:

At their core, DI boxes serve to solve impedance and signal level mismatches encountered when connecting instruments and equipment with different signal characteristics. Most musical instruments, such as electric guitars and keyboards, produce unbalanced high-impedance signals that are susceptible to noise interference and signal loss over long cable runs. On the other hand, professional audio systems, mixers, and recording interfaces typically require balanced, low-impedance signals for optimum performance and noise rejection.
DI boxes work by utilizing transformers or electronic circuitry to perform the following functions:

a. Signal Conversion: DI boxes convert unbalanced high-impedance signals from instruments into balanced low-impedance signals suitable for professional audio equipment.

b. Ground Isolation: DI boxes provide ground isolation, which helps eliminate ground loop hum and unwanted noise caused by differences in ground potential between connected equipment.

c. Level Matching: DI boxes often feature attenuation controls to match the output level of the instrument to the input level of the audio system.

Applications of DI Boxes:
DI boxes find widespread application in various audio scenarios, including:

a. Live Performances: Musicians and bands use DI boxes on stage to connect their instruments, such as electric guitars, basses, and keyboards, to the front-of-house mixing console or monitor systems.

b. Studio Recording: In the recording studio, DI boxes are employed to capture clean and direct signals from instruments before applying further processing or amplification.

c. Broadcast and Film: DI boxes facilitate the integration of instruments and audio sources into broadcast and film productions, ensuring pristine audio quality.

d. Corporate Events and Conferences: In corporate settings, DI boxes are used to interface laptops, media players, and audio equipment for presentations and speeches.

e. Public Address (PA) Systems: DI boxes play a crucial role in connecting musical instruments to PA systems in various events and venues.

Types of DI Boxes:
There are several types of DI boxes available, each designed for specific applications:

a. Passive DI Boxes: Passive DI boxes rely on transformers to perform signal conversion without the need for external power. They are simple, robust, and cost-effective, making them suitable for most live and studio applications.

b. Active DI Boxes: Active DI boxes incorporate electronic circuitry and require external power, usually through batteries or phantom power from the mixing console. Active DI boxes provide higher impedance matching, increased headroom, and sometimes additional features like EQ and phase reversal.

c. Stereo DI Boxes: Stereo DI boxes are designed to accommodate stereo signals from keyboards, digital audio players, and other stereo sources, providing separate inputs and outputs for left and right channels.

d. Reamp DI Boxes: Reamp DI boxes reverse the DI process, converting balanced, low-impedance signals back into unbalanced high-impedance signals. This allows musicians and producers to send pre-recorded tracks from a DAW back to amplifiers for re-recording and tonal manipulation.
Advantages of Using DI Boxes:

DI boxes offer several advantages that make them indispensable tools in professional audio applications:

a. Noise Reduction: DI boxes provide ground isolation and balanced connections, minimizing noise and interference in audio signals.

b. Signal Integrity: DI boxes preserve the original tone and dynamics of instruments, ensuring accurate sound reproduction.

c. Cable Length Compensation: DI boxes allow for longer cable runs without signal degradation, making them ideal for live performances and large venues.

d. Versatility: DI boxes can be used with a wide range of instruments and audio sources, making them valuable assets in diverse audio setups.

e. Troubleshooting: DI boxes help troubleshoot ground loop issues and impedance mismatches in audio systems.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, DI boxes are essential tools that bridge the gap between instruments and audio systems, ensuring seamless integration and preserving the integrity of audio signals. Their versatility, noise reduction capabilities, and ability to match impedance and signal levels make them invaluable assets in live performances, studio recording, broadcasting, and a variety of professional audio applications. As the audio industry continues to evolve, DI boxes will remain fundamental devices for audio professionals seeking clean, reliable, and high-quality signal transmission.

TEST: Quested V3110

 Anyone who deals with the big names in studio sound reinforcement technology will sooner or later come across the name Roger Quested. The very reserved British gentleman has shaped several decades of rock / pop music with his Quested loudspeakers and has been able to get credits in collaboration with names such as The Rolling Stones, Pink Floyd, The Kinks, Paul Simon, Cat Stevens, Rick Springfield and Led Zeppelin in his note life's work. A man of his caliber therefore also knows the big "recording temples" that a studio of his time resembled and which, depending on the owner, resembled a cockaigne of audio engineering due to the gigantic sales that could still be made with music at that time. Control rooms offered space for more than 3 people, so it was a matter of course to place at least one decent midfield monitor in the acoustically optimized room. Just such a monitor called Quested V3110 is available to us for testing today.

Concept and construction of the Quested V3110

Even before I could see the two studio monitors, I was already aware of the caliber of the Quested V3110. 2 massive boxes, each over 40 kg, wanted to find their way into my Meadow Studios. Due to a lack of friendly cooperation from some colleagues, I was forced to lift the 40 kg boxes onto the speaker stands alone and believe me, I have rarely been so happy to have completed a regular fitness program in recent years. With dimensions of 380 mm x 600 mm x 360 mm, the housing dimensions are still comparatively moderate, but this does not change the massive inner values of the system.

The experienced reader can already imagine where and how these monitors are used, for the interested beginner here are the key points again. With an output of 700 watts from a 10" woofer, 150 watts from a 3" mid soft dome and also 150 watts from a 1.125" soft dome tweeter, it makes no sense to place the monitors in a room that does not have at least one Floor area of approx. 40 - 50 square meters, more is better. Not that you have to drive these monitors, which offer an output of about 1 KW and a sound pressure of max. 120 dB, constantly at 110 dB, but loudspeakers of this size have to “breathe” in order to be able to play out their full sound. If you assume a sitting position of a near-field monitor, the loudspeakers thunder into your ears at medium to high volume levels to such an extent that the "inherent compression" of the hearing sets in and you no longer have a neutral perception of dynamics and frequencies. Good for “showing off your pants” in front of third parties from outside the industry, but completely unsuitable for their actual function.

With a basic price of just under €4,000 per box, the budget planning will probably be done for the majority of interested users anyway, because anyone willing to spend €8,000 for a monitor pair has certainly also built an acoustically optimized room, in which he can exploit the potential of an interception of this magnitude.

The case

Anyone who has not yet noticed which country the Quested V3110 comes from, when you look at the external appearance, you suddenly realize that these boxes can only come from the UK. I don't want to be carried away by an optical assessment of the Quested monitors, but the menagerie of dark blue back and black housing, wrapped in a finish along with a "down-to-earth" appearance, which would be found much more frequently in live sound reinforcement, does have a visual recognition value , but I don't think they look very good, especially when you consider the retail price of the cars. However, this is purely a matter of taste.

In terms of workmanship, no errors can be found, all components are cleanly processed and offer no reason for criticism. In contrast to many other monitors, the Quested V3110 has two bass reflex openings placed to the right and left of the tweeter, which offers slightly different radiation characteristics. Quested explicitly points out in its manual to optimize the seating position of the engineer so that the hearing is in line with the tweeter. This requirement alone cannot really be adequately implemented in a near-field position. What you should have in the back of your mind, especially with regard to the weight of the monitors, is that you get help with the installation or any conversion process that may arise. In particular, the soft dome domes of the tweeter and mid-range driver are constantly in danger of being dented at a careless moment, since there is no protection against external influences for said loudspeakers.

When the system is activated, the front panel Standby button will briefly illuminate red, then turn a 'pumping' blue as the system warms up. When this phase is complete, the LED will be solid blue. Should there be a performance limit due to the volume (which I can't imagine with the best will in the world with the system), the LED lights up red continuously.

The backside

The back of the Quested V3110 is very tidy and self-explanatory, in addition to the fact that it is traditionally kept in the typical Quested blue. A single XLR / TRS combo socket offers the input area, RCA was omitted for understandable reasons. The woofer can be readjusted by -3 dB, -9 dB and +1 dB using a recessed adjusting screw, while the tweeter and mid-range driver can each be raised or lowered by +/- 1 dB using 2 DIP switches. In addition, there is also an input level controller, which is also sunk, the on/off switch and the cold device socket together with a fine-wire fuse. For those who are technically interested, a circuit diagram for the signal flow is also printed. As I said, factual, clear and self-explanatory.

The Quested V3110 in practice

One or the other will have asked in the previous paragraph why the woofer reduction of the Quested V3110 can have an impact of up to -9 dB. This question is immediately answered as soon as the first tones sound from the monitor. The mighty 10 incher really hits the bass so hard that one would never dream of looking for a subwoofer for the purpose of an additional connection. On the contrary, although the very powerful bass sound immediately spreads a lot of physicality and, as a result, at least as much fun, it can quickly become a bit too much of a good thing, depending on the room dimensions or personal preferences, especially if you are listening to classic near-field monitors. So -9 dB is a decent number, but it can actually make sense depending on personal preferences.

The general sound of the Quested V3110 could hardly be more British, that is to say, the box colors the sound material a little, but in the best sense. Similar to other British products such as Neve, which is attested to have a very “own” sound in the best sense of the word, the Quested V3110 also has an extremely characteristic sound coloration, which, however, significantly increases the feel-good character depending on the signal fed in. If you pay attention to the seating position suggested in the manual, the system convinces with a very fine mid-range reproduction, which is particularly beneficial for guitar-heavy productions. The 3-way system can score here with a much more even reproduction than a 2-way system. The tweeter is also pleasing, but the reproduction is very "flattering" and less analytical than is known from comparable systems, just very "British" in the best sense of the word.

What clearly sets the Quested V3110 apart from many of its competitors is the extremely high headroom that the system offers the user when required. The behavior reminds me a little of my Tesla, with which you normally cruise comfortably at about 120 km/h on the Autobahn, knowing that in a tricky situation you can easily outperform any other vehicle in terms of acceleration. The Quested V3110 also leaves a very relaxed impression at normal listening volumes between moderate and slightly ambitious, knowing that with this system you can also briefly listen to the sound of your production in the open air area or in the trendy scene club at 2 a.m. in the morning, if that's all are filled, can be checked for practicality.

All in all, the Quested V3110 convinces in terms of sound across the board and also offers adequate sound reinforcement for larger control rooms, which knows how to convince with an outstanding bass and a fine mid-range resolution!

Conclusion

With the Quested V3110, sound reinforcement legend Roger Quested once again has a worthy representative in his portfolio. The midfield monitors offer a classic British sound with finely resolved mids, a powerful bass component and a very large headroom, allowing you to work in a relaxed manner at almost any volume.

If you have a professional recording studio with the right ambience and are looking for the right A monitor, you should definitely try the Quested V3110.


Additional Informations:

Quested Audio: Precision Engineering for Audiophile Delight

Introduction:

Quested Audio, a prominent name in the professional audio industry, has been synonymous with precision engineering and exceptional sound quality since its inception. Established in 1985 by Roger Quested, the company has remained committed to delivering high-end studio monitors and audio solutions that cater to the discerning needs of recording studios, post-production facilities, and audiophiles worldwide. With a focus on accuracy, transparency, and reliability, Quested Audio has earned a reputation as a leading manufacturer of reference-grade studio monitoring systems.

    Founding and Vision:

Roger Quested, a renowned audio engineer, founded Quested Audio with a vision to create studio monitors that would reproduce sound with utmost accuracy and honesty. Drawing on his extensive experience in the industry, Quested aimed to bridge the gap between the audio engineer's intention and the end listener's experience. This led to the development of the company's core philosophy: "Hear the truth."

    Innovative Technology and Design:

Quested Audio's commitment to innovation and engineering excellence is evident in its product line. The company's engineers use cutting-edge technology and premium materials to craft precision monitors that provide unparalleled sonic transparency. Each monitor is meticulously designed to minimize coloration and distortion, offering audio professionals an unadulterated listening experience.

a. Active Monitor Systems: Quested Audio specializes in active monitor systems, where each speaker is powered by built-in amplifiers. This design ensures optimal synergy between components, precise power distribution, and eliminates the need for external amplifiers.

b. Coaxial Driver Technology: Many Quested monitors utilize coaxial driver technology, where the high-frequency driver is mounted concentrically within the low-frequency driver's voice coil. This design results in a point-source sound dispersion, reducing phase cancellation and offering improved imaging and accuracy.

c. Advanced Crossover Designs: Quested Audio employs sophisticated crossover designs to seamlessly blend frequencies between drivers, ensuring a smooth and natural transition across the frequency spectrum.

    Product Range:

Quested Audio offers a diverse range of studio monitors tailored to meet various audio production needs. Some notable product lines include:

a. V-Series: The V-Series monitors are acclaimed for their accuracy and transparency, making them popular choices for music production, broadcast, and post-production facilities.

b. S-Series: Designed for near-field monitoring, the S-Series combines compact form factors with uncompromising sound quality, making them ideal for smaller studios and editing suites.

c. HM-Series: The HM-Series includes precision reference monitors, widely used in mastering studios and high-end audiophile setups, where absolute sonic precision is paramount.

    High-profile Clientele:

Quested Audio's commitment to delivering uncompromising audio quality has attracted a roster of high-profile clientele. Renowned recording studios, music producers, sound engineers, and post-production facilities worldwide rely on Quested monitors to ensure their work is accurately represented. The brand's monitors have been utilized in the creation of countless hit records, blockbuster films, and television productions.

    Customization and Bespoke Solutions:

In addition to its standard product offerings, Quested Audio also provides custom solutions tailored to the specific needs of clients. The company collaborates with audio professionals to develop bespoke studio monitor systems that cater to unique studio environments and acoustic requirements.

Conclusion:

Quested Audio stands as a testament to the pursuit of perfection in audio engineering. Since its founding, the company has remained dedicated to providing audiophile-quality studio monitors that "hear the truth" and faithfully reproduce sound as intended by audio professionals. With an unwavering commitment to precision engineering, innovation, and customization, Quested Audio continues to be a trusted choice for those seeking uncompromising audio quality in the world of professional audio production and high-end audiophile setups. As the industry continues to evolve, Quested Audio's legacy of excellence and commitment to sonic accuracy position the company as a leader in the pursuit of sonic perfection.

TEST: Quested V2108

 It is and will always remain questionable whether there is a "British sound" in the field of monitors, and if so, which protagonist stands out from the crowd. For all proponents of this thesis, the British manufacturer Quested Monitoring Systems will probably be one of the first names that spontaneously come to mind, as the manufacturer enjoys an excellent reputation worldwide, especially in the pro sector. The company, which was founded by Roger Quested, has actually managed to stay in the top quality segment until today, while maintaining complete independence. With the Quested V2108, the manufacturer now presents an improved new edition of its model to continue to compete in the Champions League of nearfield monitors.

Design and optics of the Quested V2108

I don't know if it's due to the isolation of an island for thousands of years, but the British have always had and continue to have a very, shall we say "unusual" relationship with colors as soon as one enters the field of audio technology. Those who remember the "Villa Kunterbunt" layout of old analog British consoles, e.g. from old Midas or Soundcraft, know what I'm talking about. Comparatively defensive is the appearance of the Quested V2108, although you can immediately recognize in which country the monitors are developed and manufactured. Only a British company will probably dare to combine a dark anthracite as a base with a dark blue metallic with a discreet hammered look in the amplifier area. United Kingdom, here we go!

The company looks back on a long history in loudspeaker manufacturing. Already in the mid-eighties the foundation stone for the career of the company was laid with the H108, at that time still in the usual, passive design. The basis for the V2108 available here for testing is the VS2108, which should develop until today as the cornerstone of the Quested portfolio. According to the press release, the current version should be characterized by higher dynamics and improved midrange reproduction. With an individual price of 2,509 euros, the speaker is also in a league where it must compete with several competitors for the crown of the top class. Let's see how the Briton does.

First impression

Oops, I had forgotten how "haptic" near field monitors can be. With the dimensions of 340 mm x 400 mm x 365 mm and a stately weight of 23 kg, placement on the desk is definitely out of the question, an official pair of stands is called for here, not only for space reasons, but also to not "water down" the massive cube in its foundation. Also in terms of performance, the Quested V2108 is not too far from the midfield, the system has a total of 400 watts, which are supplied from 2 Class A / B power amplifiers. However, the distribution of power is interesting, since both the high frequency range of the 2-way box, which is implemented by a comparatively large 28 mm soft dome, as well as the low frequency range, which is reproduced by means of an 8 inch driver, is supplied with 200 watts each in equal parts. This means a comparatively strong overabundance of power for the tweeter range, which, however, proves to be very helpful in a very relaxed reproduction even at higher volumes. As usual for Quested, the tweeter comes without a waveguide and sits open with a slight camber in front of the front wall. Therefore, be careful when transporting the box, the soft dome is dented faster than you would like.

Quested points out in its communications several times that especially the midrange, which is inevitably with 2-way systems always in the area of the crossover frequency (here 1.4 kHz) somewhat underexposed, should be significantly better positioned in the new system. Otherwise, the system has a frequency response of 45 Hz - 20 kHz ± 2dB / 38 Hz- 22 kHz -6 dB, which makes a subwoofer not absolutely necessary. Below 20 Hz, the frequency response is cut off with -3 dB at 24 dB/octave. In general, the speaker processing makes a very interesting impression. For a peak of 200 watts, the very stiff cone of the woofer is hung comparatively softly with a very elastic surround, which, in cooperation with the two bass reflex ports on the front bottom, suggests an interesting bass reproduction.

The back

As already mentioned, the rear of the monitor stands out in several respects from the standard layout of a nearfield monitor, on the one hand by its unusual color scheme and on the other hand by the three-dimensional milled, very bulky appearing heat sink for the running operation. Regarding the connection options, as usual in this performance class, the asymmetrical RCA section has been completely omitted and instead a single, locked XLR / TRS combo jack has been installed.

In terms of treble and bass compensation, it is once again quite "British" to the point, that is, 3 different control options equal three different layouts! The closer sense of this action does not really open up to me, but that's the way it is. While one needs a small slotted screwdriver for the recessed, ninefold lowerable input level control, the fourfold tuned bass control (40 Hz and below, -3 dB, -9 dB, + 1dB) requires a medium sized slotted screwdriver or at least a firm fingernail for the adjustment. The treble adjustment, in turn, is controlled by 3 DIP switches and allows, in addition to flat, + / - boost / cut above / below 2.5 kHz. Cold device plug, power switch, ready.

The Quested V2108 in practice

Well then, as sound material once again the usual suspects were used, i.e. uncompressed and unprocessed high-end stereo recordings for example of drum sets, single tracks of vocals, various test tones, several reference mixes and a few masters of my current productions, for which I am responsible myself. Completely from the gut, should one have to press the basic sound of the Quested V2108 together, I would spontaneously think of the adjective "analytical" with all its advantages and disadvantages.

First of all, let's start with the impulse reproduction and the spatial staggering. In both areas, the system can only be given top marks. All instruments are picked up very cleanly and reproduced in a detailed and punctuated manner even at high volumes. The excellent reproduction of vocals is particularly striking, revealing far more nuances than one would normally expect from a 2-way speaker. The spatial staggering allows the depth of the room not only to be guessed at, but also to be really grasped, which makes it much easier to reproduce depth in the reverb area, especially in the mix down.

In terms of volume, a somewhat more ambitious level brings out the strengths of the monitors better, although the system also cuts a good figure at low volumes. I placed a special focus on the midrange, which, according to the manufacturer, has improved significantly compared to the predecessor. And indeed, the monitor convinces with a significantly improved midrange reproduction, which is particularly noticeable in the instrument genre of distorted guitars. The important range between approx. 1 kHz to approx. 2.5 kHz is picked up well despite the crossover frequency, which is probably due in particular to the fast response of the woofer.

Only light or also some shadow? Well, as we all know, you can only evaluate the sound of a monitor very subjectively, so any description should always be taken with a grain of salt, but I personally was not convinced by the bass response of the Quested V2108. I have the impression that Quested has sacrificed some bass volume in favor of the admittedly very good midrange reproduction. The bass range is comparatively "bony", euphemistically also to be called "neutral", and does not convey the low end that the product's physical features would suggest. Even when activating the bass compensation by +1 dB, the basic sound did not generally become "bigger", but merely conveyed a more stable sound reproduction.

I didn't want to let this statement stand in the room quite so simply, however, and created a cabling that I hadn't considered necessary shortly before. And lo and behold, in cooperation with an Eve Audio subwoofer, the monitors blossomed after a short tuning. Now the speakers could completely show their strengths and gained immensely in volume and linearity. To what extent a corresponding subwoofer use makes sense, everyone must ultimately decide for themselves, for me personally it was the decisive point that the Quested V2108 still lacked to the upper class area.

Conclusion

With the Quested V2108, the British manufacturer has a worthy successor to the VS2108 in the program. The monitor has an outstanding impulse fidelity, high power reserves, a very good depth gradation and an excessively good midrange reproduction for a 2-way system.



On the other hand, those who focus on a voluminous bass reproduction should consider the additional purchase of a subwoofer despite the 8-inch woofer, but this ultimately remains a matter of taste.


Additional Informations:

Quested Audio: Precision Engineering for Audiophile Delight
Introduction:

Quested Audio, a prominent name in the professional audio industry, has been synonymous with precision engineering and exceptional sound quality since its inception. Established in 1985 by Roger Quested, the company has remained committed to delivering high-end studio monitors and audio solutions that cater to the discerning needs of recording studios, post-production facilities, and audiophiles worldwide. With a focus on accuracy, transparency, and reliability, Quested Audio has earned a reputation as a leading manufacturer of reference-grade studio monitoring systems.
Founding and Vision:

Roger Quested, a renowned audio engineer, founded Quested Audio with a vision to create studio monitors that would reproduce sound with utmost accuracy and honesty. Drawing on his extensive experience in the industry, Quested aimed to bridge the gap between the audio engineer's intention and the end listener's experience. This led to the development of the company's core philosophy: "Hear the truth."
Innovative Technology and Design:

Quested Audio's commitment to innovation and engineering excellence is evident in its product line. The company's engineers use cutting-edge technology and premium materials to craft precision monitors that provide unparalleled sonic transparency. Each monitor is meticulously designed to minimize coloration and distortion, offering audio professionals an unadulterated listening experience.

a. Active Monitor Systems: Quested Audio specializes in active monitor systems, where each speaker is powered by built-in amplifiers. This design ensures optimal synergy between components, precise power distribution, and eliminates the need for external amplifiers.

b. Coaxial Driver Technology: Many Quested monitors utilize coaxial driver technology, where the high-frequency driver is mounted concentrically within the low-frequency driver's voice coil. This design results in a point-source sound dispersion, reducing phase cancellation and offering improved imaging and accuracy.

c. Advanced Crossover Designs: Quested Audio employs sophisticated crossover designs to seamlessly blend frequencies between drivers, ensuring a smooth and natural transition across the frequency spectrum.
Product Range:

Quested Audio offers a diverse range of studio monitors tailored to meet various audio production needs. Some notable product lines include:

a. V-Series: The V-Series monitors are acclaimed for their accuracy and transparency, making them popular choices for music production, broadcast, and post-production facilities.

b. S-Series: Designed for near-field monitoring, the S-Series combines compact form factors with uncompromising sound quality, making them ideal for smaller studios and editing suites.

c. HM-Series: The HM-Series includes precision reference monitors, widely used in mastering studios and high-end audiophile setups, where absolute sonic precision is paramount.
High-profile Clientele:

Quested Audio's commitment to delivering uncompromising audio quality has attracted a roster of high-profile clientele. Renowned recording studios, music producers, sound engineers, and post-production facilities worldwide rely on Quested monitors to ensure their work is accurately represented. The brand's monitors have been utilized in the creation of countless hit records, blockbuster films, and television productions.

Customization and Bespoke Solutions:
In addition to its standard product offerings, Quested Audio also provides custom solutions tailored to the specific needs of clients. The company collaborates with audio professionals to develop bespoke studio monitor systems that cater to unique studio environments and acoustic requirements.

Conclusion:
Quested Audio stands as a testament to the pursuit of perfection in audio engineering. Since its founding, the company has remained dedicated to providing audiophile-quality studio monitors that "hear the truth" and faithfully reproduce sound as intended by audio professionals. With an unwavering commitment to precision engineering, innovation, and customization, Quested Audio continues to be a trusted choice for those seeking uncompromising audio quality in the world of professional audio production and high-end audiophile setups. As the industry continues to evolve, Quested Audio's legacy of excellence and commitment to sonic accuracy position the company as a leader in the pursuit of sonic perfection.

TEST: QSC KW 122

 What hasn't everything changed in terms of sound reinforcement in recent years. Active speakers of a third of a man's height work with power in the kilowatt range, sometimes in price regions where you might have gotten just 6 crates of beer for in the past. Due to Asian manufacturing, one has secretly become accustomed to the same price regions and it may seem rather unusual for some, why products of the above category were or are originally located in the four-digit euro range.

It was all the more astonishing for me to receive a product from the aforementioned segment with the note "Made In USA" from a manufacturer that I previously knew only from the power amplifier sector. The same amplifier from the American manufacturer QSC has been doing an impeccable job in my recording studio for over 20 years. It's a pleasure to get to know a member of the new House-Of-K family, which, in addition to its unusual manufacturing area, can also offer a few other equally unusual features.


Construction

The QSC KW122 is an active multi-function full-range system, which is a two-way system consisting of a 1 inch tweeter and a 12 inch bass speaker. The speakers are protected by an extremely sturdy grille plate, the rest of the cabinet is covered with a resistant textured paint. Three very sturdy recessed grips allow for good handling of the construction, and there is also a Direct Tilt high stand flange on the bottom of the cabinet, which allows for a straight setup or a 7.5 degree tilt. The overall workmanship of the case can be described as exemplary and very solid.

All models from the K-series have the power of 1000 watts in common, with the designation W, the cabinets are also made of comparatively light but sturdy birch plywood, a construction method as used in Marshall 4x12" guitar boxes. Unusual is the splitting of equal parts of 500 watts each to the tweeter and woofer, respectively, which however leads to an increased protection of the tweeter against clipping peaks. As expected, the power is generated by a Class D power amplifier, which is characterized by a compact design and low heat development. Should heat build up nevertheless occur, the proprietary GuardRail system and a built-in fan intervene.

In terms of dimensions, the product measures 660 mm x 381 mm x 391 mm with a weight of a comparatively moderate 22.2 kilograms. The technical key data are quickly dealt with, according to the manufacturer, the construction has a frequency response of 53 Hz - 18 Khz at - 10 dB and a maximum sound pressure of 131 dB peak, measured at a distance of 1 meter. The system has a total of 8 pieces of M10 flying points and can therefore be positioned in any orientation in flight. Due to its trapezoidal shape, the KW122 can also be used as a powerful floor wedge. Although the power output also suggests, as a drumfill I would recommend the system because of the 12-inch woofer used only in an emergency.

Striking for a system of this design is the extensive connection periphery of the system, where especially on the daisy chain use was placed great emphasis. Two independent combo jacks allow both a console connection and the direct connection of a microphone or a high-impedance instrument such as an acoustic guitar. The level of both inputs can be adjusted independently via a rotary potentiometer in 20 steps. If required, the same signals can be looped through directly to another component via 2 XLR outputs. The mixed signal is also output via a third XLR out if required. For the connection of an MP3 player or similar, 2 Cinch connectors are available. For fixed installations, an external 10 kOhm volume control can be connected via a three-pin remote gain.

The two driver sections can be divided into different presets via two sliders. For the bass range, the settings "NORM" (standard full range), "EXT SUB" (subwoofer operation, crossover frequency at 100 Hz) and "DEEP", (bass boost with internal limiter circuit as protection against distortion) are distinguished. For the high frequency driver, the settings "FLAT" and "VOCAL BOOST" are available, a filter preset that specifically boosts frequencies affecting the voice. The blue LED on the front of the cabinet can indicate either the operating status or the use of the internal limiter.



Practice

First test area, an MP3 player. The first thing that stands out is the conspicuously large volume jump between grid position 2 and 3. This is no problem when connecting a mixer with separate volume control, but when connecting a non-adjustable output, the delivered volume for background pause music could already be too loud in position 3, but barely perceptible in position 2.

However, the signal quality coming out of the speakers is of a very high quality. A very powerful bass, which already delivers a soft, but still defined low frequency range without the Deep circuit, a successful crossover frequency, which doesn't contain the notorious midrange hole, which tends to occur with a 1"/15" combination and a high frequency range, which never works in the limit range thanks to overdimensioned power reserves. In general, one seems to literally feel the power reserves in the high frequency range; at no time, even under heavy use, does the high frequency range seem angular or even edgy.

There are also no failures to report when using the microphone. The sound reproduction is balanced, the speech intelligibility good. In terms of dispersion, the conically shaped tweeter driver, which is aligned at 75 degrees, is particularly convincing. It is noticeable that QSC tunes the two speakers to each other, i.e. both speakers have the same dispersion behavior. The acoustic room illumination is unusually even, even strong lateral radiation is mastered very well within the aforementioned angle and ensures a good sound image even in the close range of the speaker.



Conclusion

With the K-Series, QSC has a real trump card up its sleeve. The system is mature, quickly expandable and of very high quality, both acoustically and in terms of processing. Easy daisy chain expansion allows the system to be expanded almost at will, especially since up to five speakers can be powered from a 10 A, 230 V line.

The KW 122 is a comparatively small, but incredibly powerful active loudspeaker, which covers a wide range of professional applications through flexible application possibilities.

Be sure to test it!


Additional Informations:

QSC Audio: Revolutionizing Professional Audio Solutions

Introduction:

QSC Audio, established in 1968, is a leading global manufacturer and innovator in the field of professional audio equipment and solutions. Based in Costa Mesa, California, USA, the company has been at the forefront of developing cutting-edge products that have redefined the audio industry. With a commitment to excellence, innovation, and customer satisfaction, QSC Audio has earned a reputation as a trusted partner for professionals in the sound reinforcement, live performance, and entertainment sectors.

Company History and Evolution:

QSC Audio was founded by Patrick Howe Quilter, Barry Andrews, and John Andrews. The name "QSC" stands for Quilter Sound Company, reflecting the founder's vision to provide high-quality sound solutions. The company initially focused on guitar amplifiers and developed a strong presence in the musical instrument industry. However, as technology evolved and market demands shifted, QSC diversified its product line to include power amplifiers, speakers, digital signal processors, and complete sound systems.

Innovative Products and Technologies:

QSC Audio has consistently pushed the boundaries of audio technology, revolutionizing the industry with its innovative products. The company's flagship product lines include:

    Power Amplifiers: QSC's power amplifiers are renowned for their robustness, reliability, and efficiency. The PowerLight series, featuring Class D amplification, significantly reduced the weight and power consumption of amplifiers without compromising performance. This breakthrough technology made QSC a pioneer in the realm of lightweight, high-power amplifiers.

    Loudspeakers: QSC's loudspeaker offerings cater to various applications, from portable speakers for small venues to line array systems for large-scale events. The K Series and KW Series are notable examples, designed to deliver exceptional audio quality and versatility.

    Digital Signal Processors (DSP): QSC's DSP platforms, like the Q-Sys series, provide comprehensive audio processing and system control. The Q-Sys platform is a flexible and scalable solution, enabling users to manage audio in various environments, from conference rooms to complex live events.

    TouchMix Series: The TouchMix digital mixers have gained popularity among musicians, sound engineers, and performers due to their user-friendly interface, powerful processing capabilities, and compact design. These mixers strike a balance between advanced features and ease of use.

    Cinema Solutions: QSC has also made significant strides in the cinema industry, providing audio solutions for movie theaters worldwide. Their DCP series of cinema processors and amplifiers have become an industry standard, delivering immersive audio experiences to moviegoers.

Global Reach and Customer Base:

QSC Audio's commitment to innovation, reliability, and superior performance has garnered a loyal customer base worldwide. The company's products are widely used in various industries, including:

    Live Sound and Touring: Many renowned artists, bands, and production companies rely on QSC's audio systems for their live performances and touring events.

    Installed Sound: QSC provides solutions for various fixed installations, such as houses of worship, conference centers, stadiums, and theme parks.

    Corporate and Enterprise: QSC's audio solutions are employed in boardrooms, conference rooms, and meeting spaces to facilitate clear communication and seamless collaboration.

    Entertainment and Hospitality: The entertainment industry, including theaters, music venues, hotels, and restaurants, benefits from QSC's audio technology to create immersive and memorable experiences for their patrons.

Commitment to Sustainability and Environmental Responsibility:

As a responsible corporate citizen, QSC Audio emphasizes sustainability and environmental consciousness. The company actively pursues eco-friendly practices throughout its operations, from product design to manufacturing and packaging. QSC aims to minimize its environmental impact by reducing energy consumption, using recyclable materials, and promoting responsible waste management.

Conclusion:

QSC Audio has evolved from its humble beginnings as a guitar amplifier manufacturer to a global leader in the professional audio industry. With its unwavering commitment to innovation, quality, and customer satisfaction, QSC has redefined the way audio technology is utilized in various applications. As the company continues to push the boundaries of audio solutions, it remains a reliable partner for professionals seeking cutting-edge, reliable, and environmentally conscious audio equipment.


- Satellite Audio Systems: Advancements and Applications in Modern Communication
Introduction:

Satellite audio systems represent a pivotal aspect of modern communication technology, facilitating global reach and seamless audio transmission across vast distances. These systems utilize satellites in space to transmit and receive audio signals, offering numerous advantages in terms of coverage, reliability, and scalability. Over the years, satellite audio systems have undergone significant advancements, enabling efficient communication across various industries, from broadcasting to emergency services and beyond.
Evolution of Satellite Audio Systems:

The concept of satellite audio systems can be traced back to the early days of satellite technology in the 1960s and 1970s. The launch of communication satellites, such as the Early Bird and Intelsat I, laid the foundation for audio transmission through space. Early satellite audio systems primarily focused on broadcasting radio signals and later expanded to include television audio feeds.

As technological progress accelerated, satellite audio systems evolved from analog to digital formats, offering improved sound quality, reduced signal degradation, and increased bandwidth efficiency. With the advent of high-powered geostationary satellites and advanced compression algorithms, satellite audio systems became more reliable, affordable, and accessible to a broader range of industries.
Components and Architecture:

Modern satellite audio systems consist of several key components, each playing a crucial role in the transmission and reception process:

Satellite: Communication satellites are placed in geostationary or low-earth orbit, serving as relay points for audio signals. Geostationary satellites remain fixed relative to Earth, while low-earth orbit satellites move in a circular path.

b. Ground Station: Ground stations are terrestrial facilities equipped with antennas and transceivers to establish communication with satellites. They handle the uplink and downlink of audio signals to and from the satellite.

c. Encoding and Compression: Audio signals are typically encoded and compressed before transmission to optimize bandwidth usage and ensure efficient data transfer.

d. Receiving Equipment: End-users utilize receiving equipment, such as satellite dishes and receivers, to capture and decode the audio signals sent from the satellite.
Applications of Satellite Audio Systems:

Satellite audio systems find applications in various industries and scenarios due to their widespread coverage and reliability:

a. Broadcasting: Satellite audio systems are extensively used for radio and television broadcasting, enabling broadcasters to reach global audiences without geographic limitations. This technology plays a crucial role in disseminating news, entertainment, and educational content on a global scale.

b. Emergency Services and Public Safety: During disasters and emergencies, terrestrial communication infrastructure may be compromised. Satellite audio systems provide a robust communication alternative, allowing emergency responders and public safety agencies to coordinate efforts and maintain critical communication channels.

c. Teleconferencing and Telemedicine: Satellite audio systems support real-time audio communication for teleconferencing and telemedicine applications. Remote locations with limited internet connectivity can benefit from satellite technology for seamless audio interactions.

d. Aviation and Maritime Communication: Satellite audio systems enable reliable voice communication and data transfer for aircraft and ships, ensuring constant connectivity even over vast oceans and remote areas.
Advancements and Future Prospects:
Advancements in satellite technology continue to enhance satellite audio systems:

a. High Throughput Satellites (HTS): HTS employ multiple spot beams to concentrate higher bandwidth capacity over specific regions, increasing overall system performance and accommodating more users.

b. Interoperability with Terrestrial Networks: Integrating satellite audio systems with terrestrial networks allows for seamless handover of audio signals, ensuring uninterrupted communication for mobile users.

c. Reduced Latency: Future developments aim to reduce signal latency, making satellite audio systems more suitable for real-time applications like online gaming and interactive communication.

Conclusion:
Satellite audio systems have revolutionized communication across industries, offering global coverage and reliable audio transmission. From broadcasting and emergency services to teleconferencing and aviation, these systems play a crucial role in keeping the world connected. As technology continues to advance, satellite audio systems will undoubtedly remain at the forefront of modern communication, catering to ever-expanding applications and ensuring seamless audio connectivity across the globe.